KMBZ continued IGNORANCE. Afganistan is another war of LOST CAUSES!

(history: War of the Lost Cause is what many called the War Between the States... a war that the Confederacy coulldn't possibly have won...from the first day to the last. The War of the LOST CAUSE" It's a war many Southern ancestor worshippers continue to fight.)

Some dirt clod minion eager for a head-pat talked on Monday's KMBZ Shanin & Parks show about how his head was about to blow up at how outrageous that black group, uh, Acorn was for the sting last weekend. Of COURSE they got stung, ignorant as Acorn is. Course the only difference between Acorn and Haliburton or AT&T or any other major corporation on the Government dole is that they are niggers, not pin-striped-suited white men with lawyers, PR people and enough smarts not to let hidden cameras into their offices to TALK about hookers. Not that white men don't indulge themselves and their clients with HOOKERS. They do. But generally more carefully. Apparently white executives steal with more style and sophistication, and so won't get noticed by the 'new media' .

I was reminded first what the O'man said last weekend, and lets face it, he's smarter than ALL of his critics put together--and that must just COMPLETELY piss off those racists. He said the racist, hateful outrageous, rude crap we hear today by politicians are just 'catnip' to the cable people. He's so right. All this yelling and screaming and the cable need to feed the beast for ratings.

But I listened to some people on Kraske's UMKC show, talking about how completely screwed we are in Afghanistan. We sent our troops to the wrong country... well WE didn't, Bush did. Ignored the Afghanistan front. Gave them just enough heat to move next door to Pakistan but didn't actually take them OUT! Now Al-Qaeda is gone.

What's REALLY too bad is that Shanin & Parks are either too IGNORANT or to PARTISAN to bother to learn the issues, even from pub radio's Steve Kraske, as he hosts national figures to talk about these issues with REAL fair and balance. Truth is out there, but even tho they hear, they don't listen!

S&P can't even talk about commonly known military strategies. Shanin's even a vet and he doesn't know military strategy! Why? Because like their listeners, they only listen to those serving up the same KoolAid. Tories to be hanged, every one!

This is precisely why they were all surprised Obama won...and are befuddled to understand why. This isn't last summer. Election's over. Things not up for debate. They seem to think it's last summer and that's how they come off to their frustrated listeners.



Of COURSE Obama is reconsidering the Bush Strategy for Afghanistan and the mideast. It's a year later. Things have changed! What, you expect things to be the same as Cheney explained them? Not likely! Whole different scenario now!

It's not Obama's job to give a general the tools he HOPES he needs to win a war with no objective. It's Obama's job to define the OBJECTIVE. Don't 50,000 gold-star parents in the US wish LBJ had done that!

Piss on that woman who called in all worried about what she heard on right wing talk radio. Why didn't you TELL her what was REALLY up, S&P? Or didn't you actually read it to know?

You know that the military doesn't run the country, civilians do. ANd the election is over. You could have said that, but you didnt. You don't want to piss off your right wing listeners, do you? You want only to REINFORCE their already stinkin thinkin so you don't run the off?

Why don't you explain these things to your minion listeners?? Or are you more interested in KMBZ MONEY than you are OUR SONS LIVES?



A careful listener would have noticed that OBAMA has given clues last weekend on all those interviews. That the target (Al-Qaeda) has left Afghanistan. Any news junkie learned that weeks or months ago. What do KMBZ's people do when they're not running off at the mouth?

There's nothing left but the Taliban in that huge rural country. IT would take ALL of our resources to beat them. Not even that is assured. Alexander the Great couldn't. The Russians couldn't. Obama, smartly, said this weekend that he was reevaluating the objective. He's smarter than all the hawks who own stock in smart bombs and Ready to eat Meals! If right wingers call him a weinie for cutting his losses, well FUCK THEM! Surely the parents and children of men who would otherwise DIE FOR THE LOST CAUSE would agree with me. But they'll never get airtime on KMBZ for saying so!

I just hope he has the guts to pull out... and not wait four years and 20,000 more of my peers like Nixon did in Vietnam from 1968 all the way to 1973. That was a long and costly five years for us to exit vietnam with 'er HONOR. My best friend and fraternity brother roommate died in 1968 and he didn't deserve that, I'm here to tell you! Yes. I've seen his name on the wall.

We do not need to spill one more son's blood to save Bush's dishonor! Sorry, we surely learned in Vietnam that no matter what year we pulled out, everyone knew every death there was for nothing.

As my daddy said, when youre digging yoruself into a hole, the first thing to do was stop digging. He was always a hawk so he never did apply that advice to his jingoistic attitude. But we're older and smarter now.

Time to cut our losses. Leave Iraq as fast as we can, leave Afghanistan as fast as we can. Neither country is worth ANY MORE of our blood.

One more thing though. How many Japanese and Germans did we allow into the US during World War two? How many black bag Germans arriving at Idlewilde Airport in NY from Lufsthanza?

Exactly ZERO.

I would rather we ban mideast Visas from coming in as we refuse to allow US visa's to fly to Cuba. Or then, to Tokyo or Berlin.

Those towelheads are not worth one more of our sons! Not ONE! Anybody who wants to send another kazillion troops to the WAR OF THE LOST CAUSE knows NOTHING about the military, history, Afghanistan in particular.

ITs a huge rural area. HUGE. We just don't have enough Armymen to do to Afghansitan what we did to Iraq.

And Parks and the GOP can say all they want about how the SURGE WORKED in IRAQ. It didn't. They just decided to stop killing US soldiers in front of the election. They turned the war on again. Had nothing to do with Obama. THEY decided. It's their country.

They laid low last summer just like they laid low when we first invaded with virtually no opposition. That's what you DO against surprior forces. Bush 41's war taught them that its futile to fight superior US forces directly.

You fall back, wait until they occupy your cities, and then start pot shotting them, killing one US soldier at a time. It worked in Vietnam. IT worked in Virginia with the Indians.

Scott Parks...don't practice military strategy. You have a journalism degree. Never took military strategy 101? Probably never heard of the 7 principles of war. Fact is, you don't know SHIT ABOUT IT! So don't lecture us, ignoramus!

And realize that the Generals talking today are saying precisely the same thing that Wm Westmorland, Army Chief of Staff said 40 years ago. Need more troops to win.

We have no chance of "WINNING" in someone elses country NOW than we did THEN, or than the British did on our very own Colonies 250 years ago. Don't get hung up on 'failure'...in Afganistan. Failure was defined in that God forsaken territory even before we signed the Declaration of Independence. Lets not get too arrogant, okay?


A basic of military strategy. You can TAKE territory with superior forces... but it will bleed you DRY to try to HOLD it! Show me a war that wasn't so, Scott Parks! You have blood on your hands because of what you HAVE NOT DONE, this past few years as you shilled gently for George W. Bush and his personal war against the wrong country to attack us.

And so does your political hero, Pat Roberts who looked the other way and said nothing. It was his JOB to know about WMD's!